Welcome!

We thank you for visiting this page and encourage you to return frequently during and after NECC. We will report daily on what we learn, and we encourage you to write back with questions.

Tuesday, June 26, 2007

SIF: Connecting Today for Interoperability Tomorrow — 3:30 PM

This session brilliantly started with a discussion of trains.

Yes, trains.

Like so many historical examples of standardization challenges, the railway system provides a wonderful metaphor for and real-life parallel of the challenges that face the world of enterprise-level educational systems. One hundred and fifty years ago or so, the railway industry began its boom, with many companies and collaboratives building railways to reap the rewards that commercial and personal transportation offered through this new mode of locomotion. The only problem was with, you guessed it, standards. One company built its cars with a 6-foot axel width, while another built its cars with a 5.75-foot axel width, etc. With all of these different standards, the railway industry and the network it needed to succeed was, literally and figuratively, threatened by derailment.

Larry Fruth, SIFA Executive Director, used this as a point of discussion to underscore the importance of SIF as a means of ensuring a standardized pathway over which student and school data can pass. SIF is all about data normalization, entering and revising information once and having it populate to many other systems. So when a new student comes into your district, entering her demographic information into your student information system results in updated records in your school library, cafeteria, transportation, and other systems. Some day schools may have more comprehensive systems that combine these functionalities, but for now SIF does a fine job at defining how and supporting the logistics of ensuring authoritative and normalized information management.

You could study the subject for weeks, but here's a quick rundown of the session and related resources:

SIFA

  • Develop and champion the SIF standard
  • Lead in Federal Longitudinal Data Grant Program

Specification

  • Not a product but a blueprint for managing school data
  • Describes the data (what) and the infrastructure (how)
  • Works cross-platform via Web interfaces
  • Platform independent and vendor neutral
  • Has a mature, developed certification program

Architecture

  • Local (district) implementation
  • Regional or state implementations, migrating data from the district up to the state department of education; 19 states nationwide implementing a state-wide SIF initiative

Online Graduate Certificate Program in Administration and Supervision — 12:30 PM

For those of you looking into a fast-track and well-credentialled certification program in the administration of school technology, look into the joint Johns Hopkins - ISTE offering described in more detail at http://education.jhu.edu/otherspecializations/iste/.

The site provides far more detail than I have below, but here are some general details:

Background

  • 18 credits
  • A&S certification in Maryland, provides reciprocity with Connecticut (and all 50 states)
  • Online platform provided by CTE’s Electronic Learning Community and Digital Portfolio environments
  • Starts and ends at NECC; next cohort just started; applications will apply to cohort starting at the next NECC, June 2008 in San Antonio
  • Cohorts include participants from across the country (current cohort has participants from 16 states)
  • Jim McGowan, program director, interviews applicants and makes admissions decisions immediately following the discussion

Admissions and Costs

Admissions
Apply by April 2008 to participate from June 1, 2008, to August 31, 2009

Costs

  • Core costs: $1,284 per 3-credit course, paid at two at a time per semester (fall, spring, summer)
  • Additional costs: Lab fees ($200 per course), ISTE membership, NECC registration (2008 and 2009) and travel, and books
  • Total: ~$10,000
  • Financial aid is available

EMS SIGMS Forum: The Changing Landscape of 21st Century School Information Centers — 10:30 AM

Members of the audience responded well to this discussion among leaders in the Media Specialist (MS) Special Interest Group (SIG). Discussions included use of free, collaborative, social networking tools (I cannot bring myself to use the overwrought "Web 2.0" term), including the following:

http://www.blogger.com
http://www.wikia.com
http://www.wikispaces.com
http://www.secondlife.com

Frankly, I found too much enthusiastic head-nodding at the "cool" features of these tools, including a lengthy discussion of the different avatar options in Second Life. I am looking for more wide-spread and quantifiable evidence as to the efficacy of these tools among students, evidence that did not make its way into this morning's discussion. Much new media Kool-Aid was present, with few specifics about how these tools improve learning.

This is not to say that online journaling (a technology that has been around for more than a dozen years, by the way) or collaborative workspaces don't have real benefits to students and teachers, especially those looking to reach less-engaged students. I just felt that there needed to be more substance behind the enthusiasm.

One tasty nugget that came out of the discussion was a watchdog site that tracks the use and abuse of online journals, giving educators using these tools a great resource to help protect students as we empower them with collaboration tools:

http://www.BlogSafety.com

On to the next session...

Monday June 24, 2007 Reflections from BS

Mondays have been, for the longest time, my favorite day of the week.
I love trying to get everything into a Monday that might actually fit an entire week... just to challenge myself.
Today was, by far, an exception to a typical Monday.
It was almost .... a month of Mondays.

There is an analogy here, of course.
It has to do with packing large days into small sound bites and stringing them like Christmas lights, traveling at 75MPH, across the darkness of my own ignorance.
I have entered the age of hyper enlightenment.
There is more to learn, and more immediacy in the need to own it all, intellectually.

The conference is an info-fest, and although I cannot possibly get it all in, I can certainly try.

The best learning I experienced today:


I realized, as I listened to the smarties at the Verizon-sponsored Thinkfinity.com panel discussion, that I was obsolete. I have been technically surpassed by my 10 year old, the new 'Screenager' , as Jim Rubillo, Exec Dir, NCTM, called her. Just like the distant stars in our aging galaxy whose light arrives long after the star has expired, by the time I arrived at this idea, I could easily be thought of as an intellectual granny. Information is changing so rapidly, that the next generation of techno-savvy is only a next younger sibling to a five year old.

Ok - enough reflective rambling.... let me tell about what I learned, and what I did...

Between 8:30 and 10:30

Armed with my conference canvas bag, it’s chipper black and green handles perched lightly on my left shoulder, I explored.
Where is Murphy?
It promised a wealth of different applications of technology in classrooms and schools that I was quite honestly starving to see.
I wanted to see what happens when trained professionals bring technology into the lives of children, instead of just ‘mom’.

As it turned out, Murphy was a large, open space that was tagged with numbers, in a random-assignment format.

I learned this from a person in a bright yellow shirt holding a sign with a big question mark on it. She was born to tell me where to go … and I was grateful.

There were whole constellations of ideas, plastered up in million color displays, blinged out with glitzy projection tools, gadgets, and gizmos. Arthur C. Clarke saw me coming when he spouted his theory about technology appearing to be magic.

It certainly was a Hogwarts experience, to look into the ordinary lives of our contemporary learners.

What was the best part? There were kids there! They were sharing their work, in an articulate, polished, thoughtful way. There were a number of poster presentations that I wanted to see in my own children’s schools.

The one that might be helpful across the board was the Warrior Wizards, offered by Jan Farnam of Sanchez Middle School in Texas. This was a rich and rigorous application of Harry Potter meets his ‘Second Life’ avatar at Sanchez. Ms. Farnam brought the literary elements into the lives of reluctant readers in a manner that I found enticing, and her students found irresistible.

After a walk-about of reading, listening, and learning about more than 30 applications of educational technology, I headed off to room B201, where the research was. I was hoping to discover the meaning to life, or at least the evidence to account for spending money on technology. I wasn’t disappointed. In a cramped, out-of-the-way room with too many chairs and not nearly enough room for ideas, Hancock, Christensen, and Knezek shared their work linking student achievement and technology rich learning environments. I was familiar with Christensen’s work because one of my former doc students had requested and readily received permission to use her survey tools in his dissertation research, and I knew her work to be of quality.

It turns out that these three researchers have brought together a substantial national sample of Iowa Scores and corresponding technology integration data that speaks to increased student achievement.

They were cautious in the presentation of their findings, hinting at the possibility that techno-rich pedagogy implied achievement gains, while reiterating the need for further investigation.

When they were finished, they invited school districts to participate in their research, as they would be continuing it.

Thank goodness.

We emphatically need strong empirical evidence to support the decisions we make, ‘technology’ or, innovation, is not always effective at presenting a solid investment-benefit argument.

Around 11:30… I proceeded to the lowest level… where all the sales people were, to buy a cup of coffee and seek out a potential pen or highlighter. I had also noted on my book of vendors (holy cow! There was a whole book dedicated solely to what was for sale!) that I should visit a host of assessment-related booths, to ask questions and learn about where the technology for the field is headed.

Conferences are a great place to learn, and top notch sales people are generally very good teachers.

I secretly wondered if I would be able to find a pen as I rode three sets of escalators, thinking how I needed a cup of coffee. Looking toward the ceiling for guidance, I realized the aisles sported dangling numbers… 900… 1000… 1100… all the way up toooooo … who knew. I would have to map it out and plan a strategic review. There were 100's of vendors here. 45 minutes later, coffee drunk and the canvas bag leaning heavily into my right shoulder, I muscled my way toward the escalators and headed upstairs.

I had successfully obtained a pen, a set of pencils, a pink highlighter, four demo cd’s, an armload of assessment literature, a pokemon pen, a Quizdom air freshener, two tee shirts that would make for wonderful kid-jamas, 36 business cards from new friends, and did I mention a new pen? I had four that were readily accessible in the handy front pocket of my small canvas bag.

I needed to get to the next big thing… a session in progress about Passing notes in Cyberspace, room B405. The presentation is excellent, offering timely information and some actual examples that Mr. Calen Tichenor knows we will all be downloading and integrating into next year’s Acceptable Use Policy (AUP). I make a mental note to write him an email, request permission to modify his work and cite him at the end of the document…

Deciding to skip lunch in order to get into the Thinkfinity.com presentation, I whistled my way to room B402… I didn’t want to miss a word of what Verizon and their corporate friends had to say about teaching for the 21st Century Workforce.

In fact, I am very interested in what corporate minds are thinking about where our graduating students need to be.

Having listened intently to Thomas Friedman and Malcolm Gladwell at the CT Forum, and having called a service number for a credit card, insurance policy, and product warrantee in the last two years, I know the world is getting flatter… the Indian accents retreating behind typical American names with cool, Northeastern dialects.

I loved Macomb’s books and knew, as a nation, we were nearing a tipping point.

It was the best presentation of the day.

The President of the Verizon Foundation, who, I am happy to report, was a very distinguished, eloquent man, apparently not yet 45 and non-white, Mr. Patrick Gaston made me glad to be a US citizen, along side him. He talked about MarcoPolo, the wonderful teacher resource that Worldcom had started all those years ago… and how it had been reborn as ‘Thinkfinity.com’.

He introduced the session facilitator, the Senior VP of HR at Verizon, who managed, with some techno-challenges… to graciously maneuver through the session in a manner that celebrated and honored the distinguished panel effectively, and supportively. I was very happy to see that this person of power was also non-white, and a female.

Hats of to Verizon for making this flat world nod to skill and intellectual capacity, while embracing diversity.


Each panelist offered valuable insight into the future of our world. Especially profound were Mr. Rubillo’s insights. He made it very clear that as a nation,

the US is competing with other societies that value math and science as a
culture.

Anecdotally supported by the evidenced offered in Mr. Fari Ebrahimi’s brief survey of neighborhood HS grads, not one of the ten of which was planning a career in engineering, science, or mathematics, and further empirically supported by college graduation trends, as a culture these are not areas of value in the US, and this is becoming a problem. Mr. Ebrahimi went on to say that if we want to compete globally, we need rock stars… in science, and math, to shine a light on the path of success. He described an atypical LA, minority boy who went on to earn an MD from Harvard… powered by the remorse and powerlessness of watching his own brother’s death. He encouraged us to use what influence we have as educators to set learners on a path toward science, and personal best, even when their humble beginnings don’t trumpet, “I am ivy-league”.

My head still vibrating from the stretch of wrapping around the great ideas presented in the panel, I headed out… Murphy again… Murphy 4… copyright issues… Darn, but this is a vexing issue in these times, I arrive too late to do anything more than get a business card from the presenter, along with a promise to write… back to room B201… another group of research papers was being shared.

I met up with Kellah Eden, from the University of South Carolina. She talked about two different learning theories, behaviorism and social cognitivism, and the use of classroom clickers. Interestingly enough, through her research she learned that students using classroom assessment clickers as formative learning tools, which she defined as group quizzes not impacting final grades, were more engaged and interested in the class. Students in the behavioral framework class, who were required to participate with the assessment system as a component of their formal grading experience, reported greater anxiety about their learning.

I needed to fit just a little more into this Monday… so at about 11:30pm, when my day was finally over and my blog written, I planned to post my notes…. However, the technology failed me! The wireless connection was down... I had to wait until this morning.

Perhaps I tried to put too much into my Monday.



I'm so glad I get another two days!

CSI: NECC—Computer Forensics and Data Recovery for Educators

Executive Summary
One of the best seminars I've attended in a long time! The two hour session demonstrated tips, tricks and techniques for performing a forensic search on computer hard drives. The first half of the session was an overview of what to consider before initiating a forensic search. The second half included a brief hands on exercise of safely duplicating a suspect hard drive and then using tools to perform analysis on the contents of the hard drive at various levels (byte level, sector level, directory/file level). The presenter discussed and demonstrated various software tools (booth freeware versions and fully licensed) for use in a forensic search of a hard drive.
While the presenter didn't discuss it, it may be possible to use the demonstrated tools to perform data recovery from hard drives that are going bad.

One of the most significant things I took away from the session was a greater appreciation to carefully assess any situation requiring forensic analysis. If the situation could culminate in legal action, careful documentation and a very structured process must be followed.

See the presenter's home page for the power point slideshow that includes references to the software tools and useful websites. If you're a true tech geek, be sure to try out the utilities mentioned in the presenter's slide show, they'll be good to have in your toolbox.

Presenter
Brent Williams, Kennesaw State University

For anyone attending NECC, the presenter is doing a session about wireless networks on Wednesday June 27th from 12:00-01:00 .
"What's Wrong with WiFi in Schools? 10 Common Mistakes" Location=GWCC B217
If this session is half as good as his other seminar, I would suggest it for tech support people.

Presenters homepage:
http://www.speakwisdom.com/

Presenter's NECC slideshow on computer forensics:
http://www.speakwisdom.com/brentdocs/CSI%20NECC%20Introduction%20to%20Forensics.ppt

Presenter's other slideshows:
http://www.speakwisdom.com/Presentations.htm